Review 2014 Kia Cadenza

 Review 2014 Kia Cadenza

Front View

Consider this 2014 Kia Cadenza's as-tried value, skim its arrangement of gimmicks and privileged choices, look on its good looking body, and one may characteristically deduce that its an extravagance auto. We'd concur. Anyhow in the wake of testing the Cadenza, its more convoluted than that. Consider, in the event that you will, Kia's startlingly aggressive plan to really rival extravagance marks by 2017, which will be initiated by the back drive K9/Quoris. The Kia Cadenza assumes a part in this mission, albeit not at all like its all the more unmistakably rich kin, its to a greater extent a toe in the water; an endeavor to equip us rationally for more-costly Kias to come.

Thusly, everything about the Kia Cadenza feels painstakingly created to inspire while taming desires. Its extravagant news and enormous foot shaped impression make it a tempting option to more modest however comparably estimated cars, for example, the Acura TL and Lexus Es350. Be that as it may, its name fails to offer the alphanumeric garbage that is basically an extravagance auto essential (XTS, 528i, E550), so it shouldn't drive off purchasers taking a gander at the likewise estimated the Toyota Avalon, a Buick Lacrosse, Chevrolet Impala, Ford Taurus, or the Cadenza's compositional twin, the Hyundai Azera.

 Review 2014 Kia Cadenza : Genuinely, Forget the Amanti

The Kia Cadenza in fact replaces the milquetoast Amanti, yet expatriate any memory you may have of that auto, which Kia benevolently yanked from dealerships three years prior. Beginning with styling that blends components from the most recent Forte vehicle, the Optima, and the K9, the Cadenza is much, much better. From a few edges it looks subordinate a Volkswagen Passat-ified Suzuki Kizashi strikes a chord however generally speaking, the impression is upscale and even marginally lively. Despite the fact that its essentially a greater Optima underneath, the Cadenza appears as though its own particular extravagance creature. Like the Toyota Avalon and Camry, the two Kias offer a stage, despite the fact that the Cadenza's front subframe is novel, as is its body structure behind of the back seat. (The new subframe obliges the V-6—the Optima lineup is four barrel just.) Dimensional contrasts are generally minor, with the Cadenza's wheelbase crossing two more creeps, general length an extra 5.2 inches, width an alternate 0.7 inch, and stature an alternate 0.8 inch.

Interior

The included size pays off inside, where there's a lot of space for four travelers or five over medium separations. The lodge is tasteful and agreeable, amicably directing the outer surface's understated feel. Materials and fit and complete in our initial creation test auto were great, and the UVO touch-screen infotainment framework worked flawlessly and without dissatisfaction. As we noted in our 2014 Kia Forte car test, UVO's text styles and representation match those of the discretionary computerized gage group, and the dashboard's hard catches. It's a pleasant touch that shows Kia sweats a few subtle elements. The seats and the driving position are agreeable for long terms, albeit parallel thigh and back backing are needing.

Who Needs Downsizing and Turbos?

The main powertrain decision is an all-aluminum, 3.3-liter V-6 making 293 drive and 255 lb-ft of torque mated to a six-velocity programmed the transmission. Kia Cadenza including all wheel a drive for frigid states yet when its all said and done chose front drive was sufficient. The organization likewise investigated dropping the Optima's nonobligatory turbocharged four (it makes about the same force) into the Cadenza yet chose it didn't fit the auto's loose vibe. The six positively isn't any less loose when it comes time to hustle. It feels far stronger than its ho-murmur specs recommend, and force constructs directly at the redline close where crest drive and torque live. We hit 60 mph 0.2 second faster (in 6.2 seconds) than in the last turbocharged Optima we tried. That auto was 236 pounds lighter and stuffed more torque. Our watched 25-mpg mileage additionally bettered the Optima turbo's by 5 mpg and fell directly between the EPA's 19-mpg city and 28-mpg expressway gauge.

ads3

Tweet